Guest Blog By Arvind Mani
Director of Market Access and Policy Research
PDCI Market Access
The pan-Canadian
Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA) recently issued a communiqué outlining their
initial perspective on subsequent entry biologics (SEBs) and
innovative/reference biologics as it aims to establish a SEB
policy framework.
Key Takeaways
It appears that
the pCPA’s first principles for SEBs are targeted at ensuring that
manufacturers of both SEB and innovative/reference products must negotiate with the pCPA – i.e. not approach
individual jurisdictions to seek product listing agreements once the SEB is
poised to enter the market. Further, SEB manufacturers must be prepared
for the pCPA to consider evidence beyond regulatory
evaluations and health technology assessments (HTA) – perhaps this
may involve reviewing international evidence. Although this may create
some uncertainty for SEB manufacturers, it appears that the pCPA balances this
with a plan to ensure a competitive market –
which may mean some form of preferential listing similar to what was negotiated
for Inflectra.
For
manufacturers of innovative/reference biologics, these principles have
clarified the pCPA’s expectations by insisting if these manufacturers put
forward proposals in response to the entry of an SEB, these proposals provide national value with no incremental costs to any jurisdictions.
Finally, the
pCPA is clearly moving towards transparent prices for
both SEB manufacturers and innovative/reference manufacturers who aim to
renegotiate their agreements with the pCPA in anticipation of an SEB
entry. Although confidential product listing agreements are well
entrenched and growing in importance for innovative products, it seems that
when it comes to the SEB market, public payers are keenly focused on
establishing a framework that ensures a greater level of price
transparency.
The table below
summarizes pCPA’s negotiation expectations for the respective manufacturers in
the SEB marketplace.
|
Innovative/Reference Drug Manufacturer
| |
National
Negotiation –must not
approach an
individual jurisdiction and should focus its negotiation efforts
nationally with the pCPA.
|
National
Negotiation –must not
approach an individual jurisdiction and focus its negotiation nationally with
the pCPA.
| |
Broader Evidence –must be prepared for the pCPA to
look at other evidence beyond the Health Canada and HTA information
available.
|
National Value –must seek negotiations focusing on
national value – i.e. no incremental costs to any individual province.
| |
Competitive
Environment –may benefit
from the pCPA ensuring the creation of a competitive environment.
|
Transparent Price –must be prepared to not only provide a
similar value to the SEB, but must include a similar or better transparent
price.
| |
Transparent Price –must provide a reduced transparent
price.
|
pCPA
First Principles for SEBs (actual communiqué)
The emergence of
SEBs in the Canadian market has led the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance
(pCPA) to begin developing principles to guide more consistent negotiations for
these products and related reference biologics, as the pCPA works towards
establishment of a SEB policy framework.
The following first
principles will guide the pCPA approach to negotiations on SEBs and reference biologics:
·
All
SEB and reference biologic manufacturer proposals will only be considered
through the national pCPA negotiation process rather than individual
or selected jurisdictions. Determination of whether or not to proceed with
negotiations with the requesting manufacturer will be made at the discretion of
the pCPA.
·
Products
under consideration by the pCPA will be informed by Health Canada's regulatory
determinations (that the SEB products are safe and efficacious with no
clinically meaningful differences with the comparator reference drugs), Health
Technology Assessment recommendations, and/or other evidence or
considerations as available.
·
Consistent
with its mandate that includes increasing patient access to clinically and
cost-effective drug treatment options, the pCPA will encourage a competitive
environment that includes SEB market growth and is conducive to long-term
cost reductions and sustainability for public drug plans.
·
The
introduction of an SEB must provide a reduction in the drug’stransparent price to
benefit all Canadians.
·
Proposals
from reference biologic manufacturers will only be considered if they:
·
Provide
overall national value to public drug plans and do not result inincremental
costs to individual jurisdictions; and
·
Provide
at least similar overall value compared to the SEB, and must include
similar or better transparent price reductions if equivalent listing
status is sought.
·
These
first principles are a starting point and are expected to evolve through the
pCPA’s engagement with stakeholders, including the pharmaceutical industry, to
develop a more comprehensive SEB policy framework.
No comments:
Post a Comment